Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 04, 2008, 03:19:03 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Visit ReillyMotorSports
* Home Help Search Memberlist gallery Login Register
+  The BigBlockDart Message Board
|-+  Technical
| |-+  Chassis, Suspension
| | |-+  rear leaf springs
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: rear leaf springs  (Read 623 times)
sweatybetty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 368

BigBlockDart.Com


rear leaf springs
« on: January 16, 2006, 11:19:41 PM »

ok EVERYONE now, i need advice and opinions on which is the best springs for my car
66 cuda, stroked 383, 4 speed with a dana 60. mostly a cruiser with a little strip time. i have move the perches inboard and installed frame connectors and torque boxes. ive heard good and bad about ss? springs. what about factory replacments like the jc whitney ones?
also could someone post a pic of a lca with the sway bar tabs. mine arent there so ill need to fab them.
thank you  sb
Logged

now that i have a brighter future, im going to start brushing my teeth
67devildart
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 465


Move Over Please, Approaching Rapidly! <--MOPAR!!

Blown72duster Blown72duster
Email
Re: rear leaf springs
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2006, 12:00:06 AM »

not to steal this post, but i agree???  People say to get the 002/003 2800lb ss springs, but what happens if the car weighs more???  What if the car weighs an odd #, do you go up or down for SS springs (since they like even # weight).  Do you go for spring weight for car ALONE, or w/ driver?Huh

Please help us!!!!!

thank you
\/][
Logged

Masters Of Performance And Racing <-- MOPAR!
green67cuda
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: rear leaf springs
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2006, 08:57:09 AM »

you're supposed to use total "race weight" with fuel and driver.  And you are "supposed" to go to the next weight above your actual weight.  My car is 3200# with me in it, but I still went with 3000# springs.
Logged

1.8031 60', best 1/8 ET:  8.275@81.84
qkcuda
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1258


Caledonia, ON Canada


Re: rear leaf springs
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2006, 09:16:01 AM »

I went with the 3400 lb auto springs on my cuda.  Haven't had it on the road yet but they seem fairly soft.  I have a chart from and old MP chassis book which shows that all of the manual springs have the same rate and all of the auto springs have the same lower rate.  I don't know what the difference is between the various weight ratings.  The 002-003 springs are the manual (higher) rate.
Logged
sweatybetty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 368

BigBlockDart.Com


Re: rear leaf springs
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2006, 11:18:19 PM »

you're supposed to use total "race weight" with fuel and driver.  And you are "supposed" to go to the next weight above your actual weight.  My car is 3200# with me in it, but I still went with 3000# springs.
hows it ride?
Logged

now that i have a brighter future, im going to start brushing my teeth
green67cuda
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: rear leaf springs
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2006, 09:32:16 AM »

rides great to me.
Logged

1.8031 60', best 1/8 ET:  8.275@81.84
67devildart
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 465


Move Over Please, Approaching Rapidly! <--MOPAR!!

Blown72duster Blown72duster
Email
Re: rear leaf springs
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2006, 04:25:29 PM »

green67, What were the #'s of the springs you ended up using then???  And have you had any traction issues?  Was it tough to lighten the car up to 3200 lbs WITH you in it??  Like, I'm a big guy, 250 lbs, and figure a large fuel cell, like 16 gallons (that's HOW many lbs???).....  I WANT to use lots of fiberglass, but being a street car I want to keep glass windows and steel doors....
Logged

Masters Of Performance And Racing <-- MOPAR!
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP The BigBlockDart Message Board | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!