Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: Why change the voltage regulator? (Read 385 times)
|
|
64ragtop
|
I'm confused. I am a retired radio station engineer and navy electronics technician, and have a pretty good grasp of how most automotive electronics components work. However, I cannot find a satisfactory answer to a question about my alternator and voltage regulator. The car is My 64ragtop Dart GT, with a '74 (I think) 318. It was originally a slant six car, but the previous owner had it upgraded. It has the later isolated field alternator, with one feild terminal grounded to use the older wiring harness. The voltage regulator is an old style two terminal one, but a solid-state replacement, not the original equipment electromechanical one.
Ma MOPAR changed the alternator and regulator to the isolated field and flat pack components for a reason! The component changes don't seem like cost cutting moves, so I'm thinking that they must have intended some increased performance with the changes. Losing the point-type electromechanical regulator is one thing, and that was accomplished by the P.O. of my car with the replacement solid state regulator.
I've seen articles on "upgrading" the charging system which show the isolated field (sometimes called "dual field") alternator and the "flat pack" regulator, along with the wire connector that some of the articles say are hard to find (but are available from Bouchillon Performance). All of that said, my question is this:
What benefit would I gain from the addition of the flat pack regulator??? It's a simple change, done by un-grounding the presently grounded alternator field and adding one wire and the connector and regulator, but what's the benefit over what I have?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it aint broke, fix it 'til it is!
|
|
|
Jim_Lusk
Official BS King
Global Moderator
BBD God
   
Offline
Posts: 4753
A-bodies since 1978, this one since 1983
|
I don't know that there is a benefit. I have been an electronics technician for over 25 years and it seems alternators work because of FM (NOT frequency modulation). I've never read an explanation on why the change.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
7903 posts on old board.
|
|
|
|
guzzimike
|
Probably economics....I think it's prolly cheaper to mass produce a Solid Sate VR than a mechanical one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NYrr496
|
Damn, the only guy I knew that could have answered this question died last year. My generator service company had an in house starter and alternator shop. The guy who worked for me had this job for 60 years. Now, I hate buying a starter or alternator because I don't trust anyone else's work.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar.
|
|
|
Jim_Lusk
Official BS King
Global Moderator
BBD God
   
Offline
Posts: 4753
A-bodies since 1978, this one since 1983
|
They did have to make one change and that was to a constant voltage regulator for the electronic ignition, but that doesn't answer the question of why the isolated field.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
7903 posts on old board.
|
|
|
|
64ragtop
|
FM indeed, Jim! I could see the problem with the old point style electromechanical regulator. Once it was replaced with a fast switching electronic one, in the same case, with the same connectors, the only difference I could see between the post '70 style "flat pack" and what I have is like the difference in placing a valve on one end or the other of a pipe. In this case, that is controlling the supply side or the ground side. No effective difference, the field coils are in series! I just thought I might be overlooking something blindingly obvious. It wouldn't be the first time!  BC
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it aint broke, fix it 'til it is!
|
|
|
|
DartKnight
|
I'm guessing that it has to do with remote voltage sensing, maybe? The later alternators had higher amp output ratings and would benefit from it. The early setups definitely did not have that option...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jason
|
|
|
|
qkcuda
|
Maybe someone can answer a related question. I converted to electronic ignition, and bought the MP electronic voltage regulator for the early style alternator. The catalogue says it is for racing use only. I am running it on my street/strip car. Am I going to damage something with street use?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim_Lusk
Official BS King
Global Moderator
BBD God
   
Offline
Posts: 4753
A-bodies since 1978, this one since 1983
|
No, you won't damage anything. I won't use that regulator anymore because they don't last well. The Wells replacement from Auto Zone seems to be a better product for less money.
There are lots of parts listed as "for race use only" that have nothing to do with emissions, but to make them "street legal" must be "tested". Using the "race use only" tag allows them to sell the product and not have any legal problems if the product winds up in a street car.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
7903 posts on old board.
|
|
|
|
guzzimike
|
No, you won't damage anything. I won't use that regulator anymore because they don't last well. The Wells replacement from Auto Zone seems to be a better product for less money.
There are lots of parts listed as "for race use only" that have nothing to do with emissions, but to make them "street legal" must be "tested". Using the "race use only" tag allows them to sell the product and not have any legal problems if the product winds up in a street car. This makes a lot of sense...I know for a fact that a lot of aftermarket parts for my motorcycles are labeled "Race Only" and I always wondered why, as they were really not related to emission controls or anything like that... It's always about the bottom line, isn't it..? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
64ragtop
|
Unrelated trivia question for ya, Mike: What's the mouse's name at the ship's wheel. I mean the real original name, not the one he evolved into. Anyone???  BC
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it aint broke, fix it 'til it is!
|
|
|
|
ski
|
Unrelated trivia question for ya, Mike: What's the mouse's name at the ship's wheel. I mean the real original name, not the one he evolved into. Anyone???  BC Steamboat Willy?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
69 GTS Clonvertible
|
absolutely correct! giv Unrelated trivia question for ya, Mike: What's the mouse's name at the ship's wheel. I mean the real original name, not the one he evolved into. Anyone???  BC Steamboat Willy? absulutely correct! Whats he win BC.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
69CLONE
|
|
|
|
64ragtop
|
absolutely correct! giv Unrelated trivia question for ya, Mike: What's the mouse's name at the ship's wheel. I mean the real original name, not the one he evolved into. Anyone???  BC Steamboat Willy? absulutely correct! Whats he win BC. My heartfelt congratulations. and condolences on being old enough to remember the actual title of the very early Disney cartoon..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it aint broke, fix it 'til it is!
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
 |