Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 07, 2008, 08:41:10 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Visit ReillyMotorSports
* Home Help Search Memberlist gallery Login Register
+  The BigBlockDart Message Board
|-+  Technical
| |-+  Chassis, Suspension
| | |-+  Cal trac Plans
Pages: [1] 2  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: Cal trac Plans  (Read 1688 times)
Mopartist
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


BigBlockDart.Com


WWW Email
Cal trac Plans
« on: June 07, 2007, 12:48:27 PM »

I was lookin around on Ebay, and came across some plans for building your own Caltracs. So for 10 bucks, I ordered them.  Has anyone used these? (Just curious)
Logged

Get your ride Cartooned at www.HotCarArt.com
mopowers
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1970


BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2007, 03:00:53 PM »

These aren't the plans are they?

http://www.hotrodsandhemis.com/Traction.html

I built my own set just because the steel was free.  I still cost about $65 for 3/4 heim joints and grade hardware.  I did change thing up a bit.

Logged

66 Dart GT: BB project.  shooting for high 10's
2006 Dakota

Mopartist
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


BigBlockDart.Com


WWW Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2007, 04:09:46 PM »

I actually like these plans better Evan! Mine are just copies of the blueprinted individual pieces of a Caltrac which really doesn't show me the entire assembly and how it interacts with the leaf torque. Quite confusing to the novice like myself. Before coming to this website, I had never even heard of Caltracs until seeing them mentioned in a different thread; but was somewhat familiar with the old school traction bars. I figured if I had some drawn up plans; I could devise my own ideas of something in between the old school and the new.  Wink These ones that you have are straight forward and clear. Thanks man! (I'm brainstorming now)  copycat
Logged

Get your ride Cartooned at www.HotCarArt.com
cuda69fastback
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2007, 08:28:50 AM »

I made a half dozen copies of the cal-tracs, little changes in mine also. No complaints, actually I dont have time to make anymore. But any variation of them is going to be better than springs and snubber. Im have concerns about the floaters and ladder links i just put in. Dont know what to exspect, little unnerveing maybe. Good-luck........  Red   
Logged
flyboy01
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3627


Dallas, TX


WWW
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2007, 10:09:24 AM »

I like those palns, I had a set of real Caltracs before, they were designed for racing, but not street use. These might be the ticket for my Dart, they look better suited to street use.
Logged

73swinger
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1254


Blackstock, Ontario


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2007, 10:24:51 PM »

isn't there a link on this site?http://www.hotrodsandhemis.com/Traction.html
Logged
CARNUT
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 305

BigBlockDart.Com


Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2007, 10:38:35 PM »

here they are for free just scroll down to the bottom
http://www.hotrodsandhemis.com/Traction.html
Logged

74 duster 318 swirl port heads 274/490 cam holley 600 with headers and a accel supper coil 333 R.W.HP
dodgedemon1
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 26

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2007, 11:56:40 PM »

Looked like he moved his rear end back is that part of the deal with cal tracs just wonderning.
Logged
birdboy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 333


BigBlockDart.Com


Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2007, 12:05:11 AM »

i have caltrac on the duster but there is a new brand out there that are called maxtrac. the only thing different is they added a a hole up front and one in the back. there's a trick to setting up the caltracs. this might sound stupid but it's worked ever time. set the car on level ground open the drivers door and put a nickal on the springs were the stopper hits it.  adjust intill the stopper just hits the nickal and stop. lock every thing down and your good to go.  i learned this from a guy that races one of the pro headsup classes.
Logged
robx4406
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 170

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2007, 02:15:53 AM »

What exactly is different from the plans at the hot rod site?  Would you mind scanning the blueprints and sending them to people interested in seeing what those changes might be?

Thanks
Logged
Mopartist
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


BigBlockDart.Com


WWW Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2007, 02:51:38 PM »

I would, but the guy has them copywritten.
Logged

Get your ride Cartooned at www.HotCarArt.com
robx4406
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 170

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2007, 04:24:47 PM »

That's a riot...  Guy takes a patented product, draws up the plans and copyrights them.  Priceless!!!   lol

I wonder if it even a valid/registered copyright.

Could you describe the differences between the plans.  I know that's not subject ot copyright infringement.

Thanks
Logged
Mopartist
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


BigBlockDart.Com


WWW Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2007, 12:18:40 PM »

I know! How about that bozo. Anyways; as I has said; he has broken it down and drafted every detail. It's actually pretty good; and not bad for 10 bucks (Although I don't think my metalworking skills could pull this off) Smiley


* draftbar.jpg (62.61 KB, 741x556 - viewed 394 times.)
Logged

Get your ride Cartooned at www.HotCarArt.com
guzzimike
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2269


1968 Dart GT (383)


Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #13 on: June 13, 2007, 12:52:17 PM »

OK, two questions..

Assuming a mostly street-use car..

1) How are these Cal-Tracs better functinally than the OEM Pinion Snubber, and

2) How are they an improvement worth the cost over these $40.00 units:

Logged

moparrr07
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1243


working on custom console


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #14 on: June 13, 2007, 05:12:44 PM »

alot less slack (alot more efficient) and they look alot cooler than a giant piece of yellow steel hanging under your springs
Logged

'72 Duster: daily driver in 3 seasons, paid for, insured by and gased up, all by my 17 year old salary

225, 7 1/4, working on 451, and 8 3/4
brakes, 11 3/4

60-0: 105 ft.
cornering gs: estimate: .90

50% custom interior
guzzimike
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2269


1968 Dart GT (383)


Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #15 on: June 13, 2007, 05:31:22 PM »

alot less slack (alot more efficient) and they look alot cooler than a giant piece of yellow steel hanging under your springs



Well......



They do have them in Chrome... !nanr  Grin

Logged

moparrr07
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1243


working on custom console


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #16 on: June 13, 2007, 06:15:38 PM »

thats true, but they also allow tuning
Logged

'72 Duster: daily driver in 3 seasons, paid for, insured by and gased up, all by my 17 year old salary

225, 7 1/4, working on 451, and 8 3/4
brakes, 11 3/4

60-0: 105 ft.
cornering gs: estimate: .90

50% custom interior
Mopartist
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


BigBlockDart.Com


WWW Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #17 on: June 13, 2007, 07:17:18 PM »

Ya know; I might just go with the old school type of traction bar and paint it black.........I hear music........."I see a yellow bar and I want it pain-ted black........."
Logged

Get your ride Cartooned at www.HotCarArt.com
Grancoupe
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 71

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #18 on: June 13, 2007, 08:00:35 PM »

Would i be correct in assuming that the pinion snubber is no longer needed when the Caltracs are on?
Logged
moparrr07
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1243


working on custom console


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #19 on: June 13, 2007, 08:55:37 PM »

correct
Logged

'72 Duster: daily driver in 3 seasons, paid for, insured by and gased up, all by my 17 year old salary

225, 7 1/4, working on 451, and 8 3/4
brakes, 11 3/4

60-0: 105 ft.
cornering gs: estimate: .90

50% custom interior
flyboy01
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3627


Dallas, TX


WWW
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #20 on: June 14, 2007, 11:28:44 AM »

The caltracks work because they transfer weight and force in the chassis and control shock, they actually cause the force the axle to be transmitted forward to lift the front end while controlling rear axle movement.

When I was racing my Dakota about 8 years ago, I had tons of problems with traction because of the flexy frame, long leaf springs, and light back end. Drag radials seemed as slippery as street tires. So I decided to do some slow motion filming of my rear end and tractyion bar setup so we could study what was happening and why the total lack of traction. I tried 3 different traction systems and ended up with the Caltracs.

Traction (slapper) bars prevent axle wrap. But they do not control chassis movement and they allow a bounce back which can unload the tire. I first ran a HD inverted leaf just like the SRT10 rams use, but this was worthless, too soft and did nothing but reduce some wheel hop with no increased traction. But some wheelhop still was there, I was running 14.30's @ 103

The next was a Lakewood style bolt on traction bar. When I was launching, the bar would come up and the snubber would contact the front of the leaf, then, about 6 feet out, after loading the chassis, suspension, and tires, the bar would tend to spring back and unload the tires. Loosing any tracxtion I had, even drag radials could not keep contact with the track. Though a little better, I was able to get 13.70's @ 104.

Next came the Caltracs. With drag radials, I did a burnout, brought the rpms up to 2000, and bogged horribly. The next run, I dropped the pressure in the D/R's to 12lbs and launched at 3500. DAMN! It took off, I hit 2nd gear, BANG! A sickening feeling came over me as I coasted to the side. Broke the trans, 2nd gear gone. We managed to get the trans into 3rd gear, and I drove it home like that. We pulled the trans and took it to Liberty trans, a week later and $350 ($340 labor, $10 parts) they told me that I broke the 2ND gear shift pawl.

It was fall now and we had nice cool weather, I went back to Milan Dragway. I lined up, all as before, 12lbs, 3500rpm. Green light, TINK! Huh? No movement? I put it in reverse, I was moving back, but something was wrong, someone shouted for me to stop. I got out, looked back, and my rear tire was sticking out 12" past the fender, clearly a broken axle. I decided I was not going to mess with the 8 1/4 anymore, I started building an 8 3/4 over the winter. This time, I would spare no expense, I took the hosing to Reider Racing and had them make it indestructable, at least to a 400hp/400ftlb 360ci engine. They built it to about 600lft/700hp level they told me, everything new inside, 489 case, 3.91 gears, Strange axles, Moroso studs, Auburn diff (I think?), and green bearings. I also put on a set of 11" drums while we were at it. Unfortunately it was winter in Michigan. I had to wait to spring, but unfortunately, I was finishing school in my final year and I was taking a full load spring and summer, then in the fall, I decided that I had to leave the state to get a better job. I had to sell the Dakota for moving expenses.  Cry

Unfortunately I never got to fully wring out the Caltracs, but I did know they worked, they gave me better traction, enough to keep breaking stuff!
Logged

Mopartist
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


BigBlockDart.Com


WWW Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #21 on: June 14, 2007, 11:57:11 AM »

The caltracks work because they transfer weight and force in the chassis and control shock, they actually cause the force the axle to be transmitted forward to lift the front end while controlling rear axle movement.

When I was racing my Dakota about 8 years ago, I had tons of problems with traction because of the flexy frame, long leaf springs, and light back end. Drag radials seemed as slippery as street tires. So I decided to do some slow motion filming of my rear end and tractyion bar setup so we could study what was happening and why the total lack of traction. I tried 3 different traction systems and ended up with the Caltracs.

Traction (slapper) bars prevent axle wrap. But they do not control chassis movement and they allow a bounce back which can unload the tire. I first ran a HD inverted leaf just like the SRT10 rams use, but this was worthless, too soft and did nothing but reduce some wheel hop with no increased traction. But some wheelhop still was there, I was running 14.30's @ 103

The next was a Lakewood style bolt on traction bar. When I was launching, the bar would come up and the snubber would contact the front of the leaf, then, about 6 feet out, after loading the chassis, suspension, and tires, the bar would tend to spring back and unload the tires. Loosing any tracxtion I had, even drag radials could not keep contact with the track. Though a little better, I was able to get 13.70's @ 104.

Next came the Caltracs. With drag radials, I did a burnout, brought the rpms up to 2000, and bogged horribly. The next run, I dropped the pressure in the D/R's to 12lbs and launched at 3500. DAMN! It took off, I hit 2nd gear, BANG! A sickening feeling came over me as I coasted to the side. Broke the trans, 2nd gear gone. We managed to get the trans into 3rd gear, and I drove it home like that. We pulled the trans and took it to Liberty trans, a week later and $350 ($340 labor, $10 parts) they told me that I broke the 2ND gear shift pawl.

It was fall now and we had nice cool weather, I went back to Milan Dragway. I lined up, all as before, 12lbs, 3500rpm. Green light, TINK! Huh? No movement? I put it in reverse, I was moving back, but something was wrong, someone shouted for me to stop. I got out, looked back, and my rear tire was sticking out 12" past the fender, clearly a broken axle. I decided I was not going to mess with the 8 1/4 anymore, I started building an 8 3/4 over the winter. This time, I would spare no expense, I took the hosing to Reider Racing and had them make it indestructable, at least to a 400hp/400ftlb 360ci engine. They built it to about 600lft/700hp level they told me, everything new inside, 489 case, 3.91 gears, Strange axles, Moroso studs, Auburn diff (I think?), and green bearings. I also put on a set of 11" drums while we were at it. Unfortunately it was winter in Michigan. I had to wait to spring, but unfortunately, I was finishing school in my final year and I was taking a full load spring and summer, then in the fall, I decided that I had to leave the state to get a better job. I had to sell the Dakota for moving expenses.  Cry

Unfortunately I never got to fully wring out the Caltracs, but I did know they worked, they gave me better traction, enough to keep breaking stuff!


Hey thanks for that! Alot of really good info there  Wink Maybe I should just get the real Caltracs or ladder bars, and quit trying to go cheap. I have a Strange Dana 60 with 4.10s on the way; so breaking a diff in the future isn't a worry; and i sure don't want the slicks to unload shortly after launch. You; got me reconsidering  Cheesy
Logged

Get your ride Cartooned at www.HotCarArt.com
robx4406
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 170

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #22 on: June 14, 2007, 12:04:04 PM »

I see something in those plans that may be a problem.

The vertical plates that are on the bottom of the shock plate are symmetrical.  I think you may run into an issue with the heim, jam nut or bung insert hitting the plates.  I think a better way to do those plates is to bring the front edge down perpendicular to the shock plate to remove any potential interference with said parts.

Do they recommend heim joints to use? 18000, 28000 and are they 3/4" bolts and shanks?

Thanks for the peak!
Logged
guzzimike
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2269


1968 Dart GT (383)


Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #23 on: June 14, 2007, 12:10:41 PM »

Well, since my car is a street-only with a 8.75 - 3.91/SG on BFG 255/60R-15s,  I'm going to try the Lakewood Traction Bars first.. Cool
Logged

flyboy01
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3627


Dallas, TX


WWW
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #24 on: June 14, 2007, 12:41:56 PM »

I actually like to online plans better than the Caltracs, I am going to build a set for my Buddy and his low 13 second Hemi Ram. Then I am going to make a set for my Dart. I never liked the front Alum bushing that came with the Caltracs
Logged

68droptop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #25 on: July 15, 2007, 11:50:33 AM »

I need to get rid of the snubber to gain some lower ride height clearance.  Are the CalTracs a good budget choice for my car?

My Dart is not a drag car, but I do want to get mord traction on launch.  I read on one of the threads that CalTracs are not good for the street.  Is that true?  What is the problem?  Do they hurt cornering and overall handling?

Thanks,
John
Logged

John - St. Louis - '68 Vert, Driver, 440 w/EZ Heads, SVT Brakes, 245/35-18 Front, 335/30-20 Rear
73swinger
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1254


Blackstock, Ontario


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #26 on: July 15, 2007, 04:15:30 PM »

I'm sure that caltrac type bars don't affect your ride at all until the axle starts to wrap up under hard acceleration, they can't ,take a look at how they work
Logged
68droptop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #27 on: July 15, 2007, 09:12:47 PM »

I guess that's right, but how about the monoleaf spring?  Is that really a drag race set-up?  I read somewhere that the monoleaf springs don't last on the street?

Thanks,
John
Logged

John - St. Louis - '68 Vert, Driver, 440 w/EZ Heads, SVT Brakes, 245/35-18 Front, 335/30-20 Rear
stormydart
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3

BigBlockDart.Com


Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #28 on: November 10, 2007, 09:45:51 PM »

do you have a web site for the plans?was thinking of making a set. thanks
Logged
73swinger
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1254


Blackstock, Ontario


Email
Re: Cal trac Plans
« Reply #29 on: November 10, 2007, 10:30:36 PM »

There's a link on this site......see above
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All Go Up Print 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP The BigBlockDart Message Board | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!