Author
|
Topic: torsion bars (Read 1646 times)
|
dbcollector
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 12
BigBlockDart.Com
|
what is the deal with the torsion bars from a 6 to a v8 car?? not real familer with this
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim_Lusk
Official BS King
Global Moderator
BBD God
   
Offline
Posts: 4754
A-bodies since 1978, this one since 1983
|
Torsion bars came in different sizes and generally speaking the weight over the front end dictated which came on the car. There were four sizes from the factory: .830 /6 only .850 two barrel small block .870 Handling package /6 and small block, stock with 340 .890 383/440
Many people have used the /6 bars in drag applications because of better weight transfer, but I wouldn't drive a /6 car on the street with /6 bars......... I want the car to handle better than that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
7903 posts on old board.
|
|
|
dbcollector
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 12
BigBlockDart.Com
|
are they interchangable or do you have to major mod to get the bigger ones to fit and how hard are they to take out
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jbarker
|
are they interchangable or do you have to major mod to get the bigger ones to fit and how hard are they to take out
All A-body sway bars are interchangable. They're not tough to take out. Raise front of car up, let front wheels hang, fully loosen torsion bar adjuster bolts located at front of torsion bar, remove retainer clip at rear of torsion bar, pound torsion bar out towards rear of car.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim_Lusk
Official BS King
Global Moderator
BBD God
   
Offline
Posts: 4754
A-bodies since 1978, this one since 1983
|
I've got /6 bars on my 440 swinger & it handles fine.
I can guarantee that I wouldn't think it handled fine........... I didn't like my old 67 fastback with no sway bar and .850 torsion bars.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
7903 posts on old board.
|
|
|
|
chryco
|
Loosens up the front suspension FOR DRAGRACING ONLY .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Hemi Darts Rule !!!!!
|
|
|
|
73swinger
|
I've got /6 bars on my 440 swinger & it handles fine.
obviously you haven't hit any whoopdeedoos at high speed. I did it with /6 bars and smacked my oilpan off the ground. running .920s now...problem solved
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blasphemous
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 87
BigBlockDart.Com
|
It would seem to me that a thicker bar would promote better weight transfer. The heavier bar keeping more stored energy pressing down on the front end as opposed to a lighter bar. Or is it because the thicker bars prohibit the front suspension from lifting as high as it would with /6 bars? I'm trying to understand the Mopar suspension setup. I'm a n00b here and trying to take in all the knowledge I can.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim_Lusk
Official BS King
Global Moderator
BBD God
   
Offline
Posts: 4754
A-bodies since 1978, this one since 1983
|
Consider that lift rate has a lot to do with weight transfer. If the front end is off the ground ALL of the weight is on the rear tires. The lighter the bars the quicker the front can lift. I suspect, though, that with all the rear suspension improvements over the last thirty years that it is less of an issue today, but what do I know? I've always built my cars to handle well and for drag racing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
7903 posts on old board.
|
|
|
|
flyboy01
|
Torsion bars came in different sizes and generally speaking the weight over the front end dictated which came on the car. There were four sizes from the factory: .830 /6 only .850 two barrel small block .870 Handling package /6 and small block, stock with 340 .890 383/440
Many people have used the /6 bars in drag applications because of better weight transfer, but I wouldn't drive a /6 car on the street with /6 bars......... I want the car to handle better than that.
I thought the 70+ 318cu A/C cars also came with .890 bars, or was it .870?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim_Lusk
Official BS King
Global Moderator
BBD God
   
Offline
Posts: 4754
A-bodies since 1978, this one since 1983
|
No, the .890s were big block only. The ac cars got the "340" bars.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
7903 posts on old board.
|
|
|
blasphemous
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 87
BigBlockDart.Com
|
Consider that lift rate has a lot to do with weight transfer. If the front end is off the ground ALL of the weight is on the rear tires. The lighter the bars the quicker the front can lift. I suspect, though, that with all the rear suspension improvements over the last thirty years that it is less of an issue today, but what do I know? I've always built my cars to handle well and for drag racing.
I understand the REASON for wanting weight transfer. I just don't fully understand how torsion bars work. A lighter bar will give less resistance to the upwards travel of the front end?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
7173Duster
|
With a heavier torsion bar you twist it less to support the front of the car so there is less "stored energy". When you launch on the strip the heavier bar quickly unloads. With a smaller bar it is twisted more to support the front of the car so it releases it's "stored energy" for a longer period of time. This is how it was explained to me. My car worked reasonably well, repeated 60 foot times within 3 hundredths, with 890 bars but I am switching to the .810 to try and get a little better transfer and to pull minimal weight off the front end.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blasphemous
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 87
BigBlockDart.Com
|
Now that makes sense to me. I was thinking of it in reverse, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
7173Duster
|
Your welcome. Glad I could help.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
62BT409
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 47
PGH, PA
|
Would someone have a picture of the torsion bar, so an idiot like me knows what I am looking at. I would like to lift the front end to get the exhaust further of the ground and some what level the car out. The when I get it to the garage/shop we can make final adjustments and repairs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
62BT409
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 47
PGH, PA
|
I did a least find out that they .920 torsion bars. Have not had time yet to try any adjusting
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
62BT409
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 47
PGH, PA
|
OK, I have here 2 pictures. Tell which one has the arrow pointing to the nut that is turned to raise or lower the torsion bars. Let's see if I can get both up Thanks JB
Hey that was very easy
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jbarker
|
First picture is the one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
62BT409
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 47
PGH, PA
|
Thank You
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blasphemous
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 87
BigBlockDart.Com
|
A bit off topic, but in response to those pictures... What kind of car is that? I have a 73 Scamp and the steering set up doesn't look like that. I have power steering, is that a manual setup?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
62BT409
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 47
PGH, PA
|
the first picture on top is a 68 Dart the second picture on the bottom is a 71 Demon
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackie
Full Member
 
Offline
Posts: 362
BigBlockDart.Com
|
remember,do not swap them around. put the right on the right,and the left on the left..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1970 challenger R/T 438 c.i. 4 sp. prostreet
|
|
|
rokketride
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 31
BigBlockDart.Com
|
A bit off topic, but in response to those pictures... What kind of car is that? I have a 73 Scamp and the steering set up doesn't look like that. I have power steering, is that a manual setup?
Up to 72 the steering centerlink is "above" the pitman and idler arms and the studs go in from underneath. 73 and on the centerlink is "below" the pitman and idler and their studs drop in from the top. That might be the appearance difference you are noticing in those pics to your car.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Deakin
|
I did lots of things to improve my 60 ft times, in the end i changed the 340 torsion bars for 6cyl and the car went from 1.75 to 1.62 60 ft but saying that, the car handled very well on the road with the 340 bars. Mike
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Dart 440 GTS, 11.09 121.31 mph 1.66 60ft
|
|
|
blasphemous
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 87
BigBlockDart.Com
|
If it's primarily a drag car, then the gain is worth it IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
7173Duster
|
I did lots of things to improve my 60 ft times, in the end i changed the 340 torsion bars for 6cyl and the car went from 1.75 to 1.62 60 ft but saying that, the car handled very well on the road with the 340 bars. Mike
Did you make any other changes when you got that large of a drop? I only ask because I am putting in .810 bars in the next couple of weeks, I would love to drop a tenth out of my 60 foot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hemi62valiant
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 44
BigBlockDart.Com
|
what would 990's or 1040's do in a street car?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Eddie Walker
|
|
|
|
mshred
|
I currently have a /6 car and am going to put a 340 in it...it will be primarily a street car but i will definatly want it to have some track time....would the /6 bars because of their weight dynamics with the 340 be unsafe on the street? when you guys talk about the car handling not very well, do you mean that the front lifts alot, or that the car is difficult to steer? this might sound dumb but this thread has now got me thinking about something i never even thought of yet
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
 |