Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 04, 2008, 02:26:19 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Visit ReillyMotorSports
* Home Help Search Memberlist gallery Login Register
+  The BigBlockDart Message Board
|-+  Technical
| |-+  Engine, Drivetrain
| | |-+  big weight question????
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: big weight question????  (Read 586 times)
1971scamp383
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 208

Rouyn-Noranda,Quebec


Email
big weight question????
« on: April 10, 2008, 05:14:55 PM »

1968 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi         or              1968 Dodge Monaco 500               
                        Specifications                                                  Specifications
                        Wheelbase, inches: 117.0                                 Wheelbase, inches: 122.0
                        Weight, lbs: 4,300                                  Weight, lbs: 4,200
                        Number built: 475                                             Number built:??                       
                        Base price: $4,800                                            Base price: $

                        Top Available Engine                                         Available Engine
                        Type: ohv V-8                                                 Type: ohv V-8
                        Displacement, cid: 426                                      Displacement, cid: 383
                        Fuel system: 2 x 4bbl.                                       Fuel system: 4bbl.
                        Compression ratio: 10.25:1                                Compression ratio: 10.15:1
                        Horsepower @ rpm: 420 @ 5000                       Horsepower @ rpm: 400                         
                        Torque @ rpm: 480 @ 4000                             Torque @ rpm: 430 ??

                       Representative Performance
                       0-60 mph, sec: 5.3
                       1/4 mile, sec. @ mph: 13.8 @ 105


            ok....for the looks the Charger beat  the Monaco.. ... but for the rest of the specs....why my C-body Monaco 500 cannot perform as well as the B-body charger r/t?  i know i dont have a 426 hemi but i think that my engine is not too far from the 426 specs   thanks!!!             not bashing on anyone...just wondering why!!   thank you
Logged

on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
chryco
Guest


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2008, 06:12:36 PM »

Hi
  Nope, I don`t consider it "bashing" at all . Bin there done that . Got rid of it . Build what ever you wish , I was just trying to steer you right. Mearly my $0.02 worth.
I`ve owned a number of C-bodies and loved them for what they were. 
  Cheers !
   Chryco  Wink

67 Fury III
68 Monaco
71 Chry. Newport
72 New Yorker
71 Monaco

I`ve never seen one of these in Stock or Super Stock , think there`s a reason?


* Aug11012.jpg (29.94 KB, 500x342 - viewed 280 times.)
Logged
73swinger
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1169


Blackstock, Ontario


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2008, 06:23:38 PM »

I think your torque and HP numbers for the Hemi are a little flawed. Not to be rude either but there is something about the hemi (the heads for one) which makes it perform a wedge style engine. I have a 496 lowdeck (500HP/540 ft-lbs) and don't try and pretend I could beat a Hemicar, If I could well... that's great but I won't count by numbers
Logged
chryco
Guest


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2008, 06:47:28 PM »

I`ve seen Hemi cars get beat on the street by 327 Dueces 350 Camaros 340 Dusters . Why ? They were LIGHTER. At the track it was usualy different though, the hemi would catch and pass them . Voo Doo baby !
Logged
1971scamp383
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 208

Rouyn-Noranda,Quebec


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2008, 08:16:58 PM »

Hi
  Nope, I don`t consider it "bashing" at all . Bin there done that . Got rid of it . Build what ever you wish , I was just trying to steer you right. Mearly my $0.02 worth.
 I`ve owned a number of C-bodies and loved them for what they were. 
  Cheers !
   Chryco  Wink

67 Fury III
68 Monaco
71 Chry. Newport
72 New Yorker
71 Monaco

I`ve never seen one of these in Stock or Super Stock , think there`s a reason?
ya i know that.....its just that i alredy have the car and dont have much money to buy another...dart...duster...cuda.....something LIGHTER.....i love the car...and if im disappointed about this car this summer....i ll just trow more money into it until i have something that pull like i want...but thanks chryco and all of you guys that help me with this build.....very appreciated!!!!!! and will send you feedback of my build in about a month or two.....damn snow!!!!!!!!!! thank you thank you thank you
Logged

on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
NYrr496
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3803

Long Island, NY


Re: big weight question????
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2008, 10:37:00 PM »

Just like Chryco said, There used to be a guy here on Long Island that ran a 289 Mustang that was completely lightened. I saw that car beat a 496 Camaro once.

You could do a big block with aluminum heads, intake, water pump... Install aluminum brakes from SSBC to lose some unsprung weight, light wheels. you know the drill.
Every ounce you take off that car will make it faster.

A while back there was a C body in a magazine with an injected 440 that ran 9's.
Logged

It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar.
FastmOp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 646

BigBlockDart.Com


Re: big weight question????
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2008, 02:19:38 PM »

We have a member with a Sea-body that's faster then 90% of the cars on this site.  Wink
Logged
1971scamp383
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 208

Rouyn-Noranda,Quebec


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2008, 02:40:19 PM »

We have a member with a Sea-body that's faster then 90% of the cars on this site.  Wink
SEA-BODY  LOL LOL i like that!!!!! lol bash
Logged

on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
ksdartguy
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503


Is it really Just a 383? Well, Maybe!


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2008, 06:04:26 PM »

Just remember it takes HP and more importantly TQ to move the Sea bodies. Grin
As far as a 383 doing it read this.http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/155_0209_383_engine_restore/index.html
Not bad for a stock 383 with a few bolt ons.

Its more about the right combo of parts.

Rick
 bbd sign
Logged

69 Swinger,3.54 Dana, 400/499, Stealth heads, Crower 262/266d, .686/.696L roller,11 to 1, 950 Bigs, E85 carb.
Best so far,   10.82 @ 124mph through the mufflers.
PureGTS
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1091


I don't have kids; I have a herd!


Re: big weight question????
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2008, 09:10:52 PM »

Here's something along the same lines I noticed too the other day. In the latest Mopar Muscle, in the West Oaks add, they list a Hemi with the following spec's:

426 CID
465 HP
480 FT/L

$13100 (lot's O dough, if you ask my wife  madwife)

Yeah, OK. And then I noticed this down below:

402 CID
435 HP
470 FT/LBS

$5,999  Half off Honey! Uh, Its on sale! (Ya gotta talk to em in a language they understand. That's the key.  )

  I'll bet you that if you put these engines in similar cars they'd probably be real close to the same numbers. The advantage going to the small block I'm afraid. Based on the weight difference alone. Besides, how hard could it be to turn up the 402 to pick up the 30HP and 10 FT/LBS to match the hymee?
Logged

Knowldge is power, power is speed, speed is good, low E.T. is better
jyrki
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 758

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2008, 03:29:00 AM »


I`ve never seen one of these in Stock or Super Stock , think there`s a reason?

Maybe they are too quick for the class? Running 8's in street trim on pump gas doesn't seem to be much of a problem.
 Grin


Logged
chryco
Guest


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2008, 07:53:19 AM »


I`ve never seen one of these in Stock or Super Stock , think there`s a reason?

Maybe they are too quick for the class? Running 8's in street trim on pump gas doesn't seem to be much of a problem.
 Grin




Impressive ! Just think how fast that guy could be going in a much lighter bodied car . 
 Maybe enough for 7`s Huh  You can make anything fast , if you have enough $$$$$$
to throw at it.  Even big block Darts .
 Happy Motoring Everybody !!



I`ll bet that`s a nearly stock 318 in there !!!
Logged
jyrki
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 758

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2008, 08:41:55 AM »

Yes, it's an original 318 car! It's a bit hard to see the engine under all the equipment, because the car is loaded, but I believe it's still the original 318.  Grin
Logged
67 dartgts
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 768


Go fast or go Home


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2008, 08:55:03 AM »

Hello:
  Looking at you comparision chart, not sure where your 383 figures are from.  But the highest performance 383  ever produced by Mopar was the 1962 Chrysler 300J.  Equipped with special heads and dual quads it only put out 343 hp.
  Given your 4200 lb car thats 12.25 lbs. per horse way short of what you need.  (4200 lbs divided by 343 hp) need 10lbs per hp. at least, better if 8 to 9 lbs. hp.

  I don't want to bash your car or you but, since your on a tight budget it may be better to hold off on spending more on this car.  Build what you want but, rember every dollar spend on this car must produce more power than the dollar I spend on my race car.  Why? Bcause your 1200
pounds heavier than me, and your total frontal mass is much greater.
  Just my opinion.
     
   Maynard

Logged

1967 Dart GTS(orginial owner) / 1967 Dart 2 door post 440  / 2001 PTCruiser / 2004 Dodge Ram Quad Laramie Hemi (small grage[/img]
ksdartguy
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503


Is it really Just a 383? Well, Maybe!


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2008, 10:02:37 AM »

Don't forget the stock 383 was slowed back on the intake and exhaust.
Just bolt-ons will fix that. Check this article.
http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/155_0209_383_engine_restore/index.html
Rick
Logged

69 Swinger,3.54 Dana, 400/499, Stealth heads, Crower 262/266d, .686/.696L roller,11 to 1, 950 Bigs, E85 carb.
Best so far,   10.82 @ 124mph through the mufflers.
1971scamp383
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 208

Rouyn-Noranda,Quebec


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #15 on: April 14, 2008, 12:28:32 PM »

Hello:
  Looking at you comparision chart, not sure where your 383 figures are from.  But the highest performance 383  ever produced by Mopar was the 1962 Chrysler 300J.  Equipped with special heads and dual quads it only put out 343 hp.
  Given your 4200 lb car thats 12.25 lbs. per horse way short of what you need.  (4200 lbs divided by 343 hp) need 10lbs per hp. at least, better if 8 to 9 lbs. hp.

  I don't want to bash your car or you but, since your on a tight budget it may be better to hold off on spending more on this car.  Build what you want but, rember every dollar spend on this car must produce more power than the dollar I spend on my race car.  Why? Bcause your 1200
pounds heavier than me, and your total frontal mass is much greater.
  Just my opinion.
     
   Maynard


my engine is not stock......i know ...my 383 was 290 hp stock.....i think its a little better right now!!!!383 .030 over...stock forged crank polish and new bearing....edelbrock double roller timming chain...edelbrock torquer aluminium intake.....comp cams xe274.....edelbrock 750 cfm performer series....full length hedman headers 1 7/8 ..3'' out....440source aluminium heads(2.14 1.81 valves to be milled???) ....keith black dome pistons..(6cc dome)...10.1cr right now.....2500 torque stall(stall at 2900 rpm)...freshly rebuilt 727 with b&m transkit(shift kit)...3.91 rear gear with locker lock right ....i know this is not the biggest baddest built ever but .....i think that its gonna be faster than the stock one!!!!!!!!
Logged

on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
NYrr496
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3803

Long Island, NY


Re: big weight question????
« Reply #16 on: April 14, 2008, 12:42:48 PM »

Lose the torker. You need a Performer RPM on the boat.
Logged

It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar.
chryco
Guest


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #17 on: April 14, 2008, 06:26:46 PM »

Yes, it's an original 318 car! It's a bit hard to see the engine under all the equipment, because the car is loaded, but I believe it's still the original 318.  Grin


Very Impressive ! Didn`t say it couldn`t be done , but ........$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ? No ?
Logged
FastmOp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 646

BigBlockDart.Com


Re: big weight question????
« Reply #18 on: April 14, 2008, 09:14:37 PM »

Love the launch pic jyrki drinks I knew you'd be happy to see this post  Cool
And as for the guy that started this thread and your combo, sounds like a Nice combo thats going to be fun to drive. It should move on out pretty well Wink
Logged
1971scamp383
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 208

Rouyn-Noranda,Quebec


Email
Re: big weight question????
« Reply #19 on: April 14, 2008, 11:12:38 PM »

Love the launch pic jyrki drinks I knew you'd be happy to see this post  Cool
And as for the guy that started this thread and your combo, sounds like a Nice combo thats going to be fun to drive. It should move on out pretty well Wink
ohhhhh...thanks a lot for that....really appreciated !!!!!!! thank you Grin
Logged

on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP The BigBlockDart Message Board | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!