Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: big weight question???? (Read 586 times)
|
|
1971scamp383
|
1968 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi or 1968 Dodge Monaco 500 Specifications Specifications Wheelbase, inches: 117.0 Wheelbase, inches: 122.0 Weight, lbs: 4,300 Weight, lbs: 4,200 Number built: 475 Number built:?? Base price: $4,800 Base price: $ Top Available Engine Available Engine Type: ohv V-8 Type: ohv V-8 Displacement, cid: 426 Displacement, cid: 383 Fuel system: 2 x 4bbl. Fuel system: 4bbl. Compression ratio: 10.25:1 Compression ratio: 10.15:1 Horsepower @ rpm: 420 @ 5000 Horsepower @ rpm: 400 Torque @ rpm: 480 @ 4000 Torque @ rpm: 430 ?? Representative Performance 0-60 mph, sec: 5.3 1/4 mile, sec. @ mph: 13.8 @ 105 ok....for the looks the Charger beat the Monaco.. ... but for the rest of the specs....why my C-body Monaco 500 cannot perform as well as the B-body charger r/t? i know i dont have a 426 hemi but i think that my engine is not too far from the 426 specs thanks!!! not bashing on anyone...just wondering why!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
|
|
|
chryco
Guest
|
Hi Nope, I don`t consider it "bashing" at all . Bin there done that . Got rid of it . Build what ever you wish , I was just trying to steer you right. Mearly my $0.02 worth. I`ve owned a number of C-bodies and loved them for what they were. Cheers ! Chryco  67 Fury III 68 Monaco 71 Chry. Newport 72 New Yorker 71 Monaco I`ve never seen one of these in Stock or Super Stock , think there`s a reason?
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
73swinger
|
I think your torque and HP numbers for the Hemi are a little flawed. Not to be rude either but there is something about the hemi (the heads for one) which makes it perform a wedge style engine. I have a 496 lowdeck (500HP/540 ft-lbs) and don't try and pretend I could beat a Hemicar, If I could well... that's great but I won't count by numbers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chryco
Guest
|
I`ve seen Hemi cars get beat on the street by 327 Dueces 350 Camaros 340 Dusters . Why ? They were LIGHTER. At the track it was usualy different though, the hemi would catch and pass them . Voo Doo baby !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
1971scamp383
|
Hi Nope, I don`t consider it "bashing" at all . Bin there done that . Got rid of it . Build what ever you wish , I was just trying to steer you right. Mearly my $0.02 worth. I`ve owned a number of C-bodies and loved them for what they were. Cheers ! Chryco  67 Fury III 68 Monaco 71 Chry. Newport 72 New Yorker 71 Monaco I`ve never seen one of these in Stock or Super Stock , think there`s a reason? ya i know that.....its just that i alredy have the car and dont have much money to buy another...dart...duster...cuda.....something LIGHTER.....i love the car...and if im disappointed about this car this summer....i ll just trow more money into it until i have something that pull like i want...but thanks chryco and all of you guys that help me with this build.....very appreciated!!!!!! and will send you feedback of my build in about a month or two.....damn snow!!!!!!!!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
|
|
|
|
NYrr496
|
Just like Chryco said, There used to be a guy here on Long Island that ran a 289 Mustang that was completely lightened. I saw that car beat a 496 Camaro once.
You could do a big block with aluminum heads, intake, water pump... Install aluminum brakes from SSBC to lose some unsprung weight, light wheels. you know the drill. Every ounce you take off that car will make it faster.
A while back there was a C body in a magazine with an injected 440 that ran 9's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar.
|
|
|
|
FastmOp
|
We have a member with a Sea-body that's faster then 90% of the cars on this site. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
1971scamp383
|
We have a member with a Sea-body that's faster then 90% of the cars on this site.  SEA-BODY  i like that!!!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
|
|
|
|
ksdartguy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
69 Swinger,3.54 Dana, 400/499, Stealth heads, Crower 262/266d, .686/.696L roller,11 to 1, 950 Bigs, E85 carb. Best so far, 10.82 @ 124mph through the mufflers.
|
|
|
|
PureGTS
|
Here's something along the same lines I noticed too the other day. In the latest Mopar Muscle, in the West Oaks add, they list a Hemi with the following spec's: 426 CID465 HP 480 FT/L $13100 (lot's O dough, if you ask my wife  ) Yeah, OK. And then I noticed this down below: 402 CID435 HP 470 FT/LBS $5,999 Half off Honey! Uh, Its on sale! (Ya gotta talk to em in a language they understand. That's the key.  ) I'll bet you that if you put these engines in similar cars they'd probably be real close to the same numbers. The advantage going to the small block I'm afraid. Based on the weight difference alone. Besides, how hard could it be to turn up the 402 to pick up the 30HP and 10 FT/LBS to match the hymee?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Knowldge is power, power is speed, speed is good, low E.T. is better
|
|
|
|
jyrki
|
I`ve never seen one of these in Stock or Super Stock , think there`s a reason?
Maybe they are too quick for the class? Running 8's in street trim on pump gas doesn't seem to be much of a problem.  
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chryco
Guest
|
I`ve never seen one of these in Stock or Super Stock , think there`s a reason?
Maybe they are too quick for the class? Running 8's in street trim on pump gas doesn't seem to be much of a problem.   Impressive ! Just think how fast that guy could be going in a much lighter bodied car . Maybe enough for 7`s  You can make anything fast , if you have enough $$$$$$ to throw at it. Even big block Darts . Happy Motoring Everybody !! I`ll bet that`s a nearly stock 318 in there !!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 dartgts
|
Hello: Looking at you comparision chart, not sure where your 383 figures are from. But the highest performance 383 ever produced by Mopar was the 1962 Chrysler 300J. Equipped with special heads and dual quads it only put out 343 hp. Given your 4200 lb car thats 12.25 lbs. per horse way short of what you need. (4200 lbs divided by 343 hp) need 10lbs per hp. at least, better if 8 to 9 lbs. hp.
I don't want to bash your car or you but, since your on a tight budget it may be better to hold off on spending more on this car. Build what you want but, rember every dollar spend on this car must produce more power than the dollar I spend on my race car. Why? Bcause your 1200 pounds heavier than me, and your total frontal mass is much greater. Just my opinion. Maynard
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1967 Dart GTS(orginial owner) / 1967 Dart 2 door post 440 / 2001 PTCruiser / 2004 Dodge Ram Quad Laramie Hemi (small grage  [/img]
|
|
|
|
ksdartguy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
69 Swinger,3.54 Dana, 400/499, Stealth heads, Crower 262/266d, .686/.696L roller,11 to 1, 950 Bigs, E85 carb. Best so far, 10.82 @ 124mph through the mufflers.
|
|
|
|
1971scamp383
|
Hello: Looking at you comparision chart, not sure where your 383 figures are from. But the highest performance 383 ever produced by Mopar was the 1962 Chrysler 300J. Equipped with special heads and dual quads it only put out 343 hp. Given your 4200 lb car thats 12.25 lbs. per horse way short of what you need. (4200 lbs divided by 343 hp) need 10lbs per hp. at least, better if 8 to 9 lbs. hp.
I don't want to bash your car or you but, since your on a tight budget it may be better to hold off on spending more on this car. Build what you want but, rember every dollar spend on this car must produce more power than the dollar I spend on my race car. Why? Bcause your 1200 pounds heavier than me, and your total frontal mass is much greater. Just my opinion. Maynard
my engine is not stock......i know ...my 383 was 290 hp stock.....i think its a little better right now!!!!383 .030 over...stock forged crank polish and new bearing....edelbrock double roller timming chain...edelbrock torquer aluminium intake.....comp cams xe274.....edelbrock 750 cfm performer series....full length hedman headers 1 7/8 ..3'' out....440source aluminium heads(2.14 1.81 valves to be milled???) ....keith black dome pistons..(6cc dome)...10.1cr right now.....2500 torque stall(stall at 2900 rpm)...freshly rebuilt 727 with b&m transkit(shift kit)...3.91 rear gear with locker lock right ....i know this is not the biggest baddest built ever but .....i think that its gonna be faster than the stock one!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
|
|
|
|
NYrr496
|
Lose the torker. You need a Performer RPM on the boat.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar.
|
|
|
chryco
Guest
|
Yes, it's an original 318 car! It's a bit hard to see the engine under all the equipment, because the car is loaded, but I believe it's still the original 318.   Very Impressive ! Didn`t say it couldn`t be done , but ........$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ? No ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
FastmOp
|
Love the launch pic jyrki  I knew you'd be happy to see this post  And as for the guy that started this thread and your combo, sounds like a Nice combo thats going to be fun to drive. It should move on out pretty well 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
1971scamp383
|
Love the launch pic jyrki  I knew you'd be happy to see this post  And as for the guy that started this thread and your combo, sounds like a Nice combo thats going to be fun to drive. It should move on out pretty well  ohhhhh...thanks a lot for that....really appreciated !!!!!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
on the build....1971 plymouth scamp 383...
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
 |