Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 06, 2008, 09:20:24 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Visit ReillyMotorSports
* Home Help Search Memberlist gallery Login Register
+  The BigBlockDart Message Board
|-+  Technical
| |-+  Engine, Drivetrain
| | |-+  TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers  (Read 413 times)
sperrydan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 132


I live for Mopar and my Ruth


Email
TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« on: May 12, 2008, 04:58:44 AM »

Whats Better . For power and Tq and Whats better For street driving  . Do The tti headers limit turning like some firewall headers do.
Logged

farmington
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 701


Metro Detroit


Email
Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2008, 08:42:15 AM »

Pretty sure that the tti's make more power than schu's.  But the schu's have a lot more ground clearance.  Schu's are easier to install too.  Way easier.  I remember reading somewhere that on a 500hp motor the schu's were down about 40hp from Hooker fenderwells.  If that helps.
Logged

When in doubt, Whip it out!
guzzimike
BBD God
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1861


1968 Dart GT (383)


Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2008, 12:37:03 PM »

 agree

I remember reading somewhere that the Schummies are OK up to 500HP.

If your engine makes more than 500HP go with something else..

Logged

DustBuster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 598


BigBlockDart.Com


WWW Email
Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2008, 12:49:25 PM »

If you go with the TTI's get the 1-3/4" primaries. My 2" primaries are overkill. Plus you have more room for those tight spots. I have Schu's too but they need to be modified for 4 speed cars.
Logged

375InStroke
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 336

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2008, 12:00:43 PM »

The Schu's are only 1-5/8".  That's smallblock territory.  I'd run manifolds before I'd use those.  What size motor?  Perhaps with a 383.
Logged
Two Lane
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2008, 12:38:14 PM »


Do The tti headers limit turning

like some


firewall headers

 
do.



What are "firewall headers"?


Did you mean [b][fenderwell/b] headers?  ------------------------  Huh
Logged
Womanator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 627


Womanator Racing


Email
Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2008, 05:10:40 PM »

I've run my Schumachers to 11.59 et's with a 440 auto trans.
Logged


DustBuster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 598


BigBlockDart.Com


WWW Email
Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2008, 07:52:01 PM »

The Schu's are only 1-5/8".  That's smallblock territory.  I'd run manifolds before I'd use those.  What size motor?  Perhaps with a 383.

 you'd better check out some facts first. A tri -y design is better than you think
Logged

steel city dart
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 40

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2008, 08:59:03 PM »

Logged
375InStroke
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 336

BigBlockDart.Com


Email
Re: TTI Headers VS Schumacher Tri-Y headers
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2008, 11:43:45 AM »

you'd better check out some facts first. A tri -y design is better than you think
The Schu site does show a decrease in power compared to full length headers.  It doesn't show an improvement compared to manifolds.  There are cars in F.A.S.T. that run in the 10s through manifolds with skinny bias tires.  Headers are definitely a preference thing.  There are compromises to headers and manifolds.  To me, the manifolds win out.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP The BigBlockDart Message Board | Powered by SMF 1.0.5.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!